What Is a Baiting Attack?
The term “baiting attack” refers to a social engineering technique where an attacker entices a person with a false promise, exploiting their curiosity or greed. An attacker practices baiting by leaving a USB stick with a malicious payload in parking lots or lobbies, hoping that someone will plug it into a device out of curiosity, allowing the malware to install.
In a baiting cyberattack, the attacker might send an email containing a malicious file to the victim’s inbox. The attachment installs itself on your computer and begins spying on your activity when you open it.
Additionally, the attacker emails you with a link to a malicious code-hosting website. When clicked, this link could infect your device with ransomware or malware.
Hackers frequently use baiting attacks to extract money or personal information from their victims. As criminals have discovered new techniques to deceive individuals into becoming targets of cybercrime, this attack has increased in frequency.
What is baiting in cybersecurity?
What is baiting in cybersecurity? Baiting is a form of social engineering that deceives a target into opening attachments, clicking links, or installing malicious software. It’s important to always approach these offers with a fair sense of caution because baiting can occur both physically and online.
Scammers frequently use promises of romantic relationships, financial transfers, and even employment possibilities to entice their victims to engage. Knowing how baiting attacks work will make it easier for you to spot potential dangers later on!
How does baiting work?
Social engineering includes baiting. Like previous attacks, baiting takes advantage of human nature. Accessing an organization’s internal network or obtaining sensitive data are the primary objectives.
Every individual has some degree of curiosity, fear, and greed that affects his choices and actions. That’s just the nature of people. This is precisely what criminals who strategize baiting attacks exploit.
Humans are unlikely to change their nature anytime soon, but we can learn how to defend ourselves.
Baiting vs. Phishing
Although phishing and baiting attacks may have certain similarities, it’s crucial to recognize their differences:
Sending fake communications, such as emails or texts, that replicate trustworthy companies or people is a common practice in phishing attempts. By posing as a reliable organization, phishing attempts aim to fool users into disclosing private information, such as credit card numbers or passwords.
On the other hand, baiting attacks focus on manipulating people’s emotions to risk their safety. Baiting attacks, aimed at exploiting curiosity or lust for personal gain, occasionally utilize enticing offers or involve the use of compromised equipment.
The goal of both kinds of attacks is to trick people, but knowing the differences between spear phishing and baiting may help people and organizations recognize and protect themselves from these dangers.
Read more:
| Spear Phishing Definition: Targeted Cyberattack Explained | What is spear phishing in cyber security? |
| Spear Phishing Attack: A Targeted Cyber Threat | Spear Phishing Examples: Protect Yourself |
Techniques of Baiting Attack
The bait can take on various forms.
Online downloads: Instant messaging apps, social media, or email can send URLs to harmful files. Followers who click on these kinds of links will receive them from instant messaging apps like Facebook Messenger and Instagram Messenger.
Devices infected with malware: An attacker may sell a PC that has been infected with malware on the dark web. By connecting the gadget to their network, prospective customers may test it and determine if it infects them.
Tempting offers: These emails ask recipients to purchase a product for free or at a reduced cost. Instead of offering products, the link directs recipients to malicious websites.
How Can a Baiting Attack Be Prevented?
It takes effort to prevent a successful baiting attack. Understanding the attackers’ intentions and objectives is the only method.
Train Your Staff Members
Providing your staff with self-defense training is the first step in stopping a successful baiting attempt. Training and awareness efforts can effectively inform them about the latest phishing trends and techniques. They should also learn to identify possible dangers before opening attachments or clicking on links.
Avoid constantly clicking on links.
Employees tend to be lazy and click on any link they see in emails, assuming they must be secure. That being said, phishers frequently send communications that appear to be from trustworthy sources, including the email address of your business or the address of another employee (like an HR representative).
Learn to steer clear of bait attacks.
Be cautious when accepting offers that appear excessively favorable, such as those offering free money or goods.
The offer is most likely not as amazing as it looks.
Never respond to an email or text message requesting personal or financial information, especially if the sender claims to be from your bank! Ask your bank if they sent the message requesting this information, give them a call instead, and then report the fraudster.
Make use of anti-malware and antivirus software.
Although there are many excellent antivirus solutions available, not all of them can protect you against an attack. You need one that can detect and stop the latest threats before they infect your computer. Our Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Premium program, which offers real-time protection from malware and other dangers, is available for free if you don’t already have it installed.
Before using external devices, make sure they are free of malware.
External devices such as external hard drives and USB flash drives, when connected to your computer, have the potential to harbor malware that could infect it. Therefore, ensure that each external device you attach to your computer has first undergone a malware scan.
Convene coordinated attack simulations.
Organizing coordinated mock attacks is another strategy to stop effective baiting attempts. By identifying flaws in your processes and systems, these simulations help you address them before they become serious issues. Additionally, they help staff members become accustomed to spotting suspicious activity, enabling them to recognize it when it happens.
What is spear phishing attack? A detailed guide
Spear phishing vs phishing: Understand the Risks
How do spear phishing attacks differ from standard phishing attacks
Baiting Attack Types
Websites for downloading and streaming
Cybercriminals can commit baiting by using websites that provide free software, movies, music, games, and other content. When the user clicks on the related link, they will download malware onto their device instead of the material they were expecting to receive. The constant pop-up ads on these websites may also cause the infection.
Deals and Online Competitions
The use of unrealistic offers and online competitions can also be considered baiting in cyber security. An offer such as “Grab The Latest iPhone for £100” could entice users to click on a malicious link, thereby infecting their computer with malware.
Alternatively, baiting could take the form of a contest that offers monetary rewards or the chance to win desirable consumer gadgets such as iPhones, iPads, gaming consoles, etc. This situation aims to deceive the victim into disclosing personal information to scam them or spy on their employer.
Devices infected with malware
Malicious actors can use USB drives to physically carry out baiting, even if the other two techniques are digital. In this scenario, the cybercriminal would implant malware-infected USB drives or other physical devices in or near the target firm. This could occur in the parking lots, restrooms, hallways, reception areas, etc. Even worse, these gadgets often incorporate the company’s branding or emblem to appear more authentic. After that, an inquisitive worker might grab the compromised disk and connect it to their laptop or PC.
Adding to their cleverness, the cybercriminals would frequently load files and folders with names like “Confidential Employee Bonus Details” to pique the victim’s interest. This allows users to install harmful software or code on their devices before it spreads throughout the company’s network, leading to cyberattacks and data breaches.
Baiting Attacks: Real-World Examples
I’ve created five real-world case studies featuring baiting attacks to help you understand how they work in the real world and to highlight the potential consequences.
Examining them will help us understand how these attacks operate. Let’s get started!
The 2010 Stuxnet Worm
Perhaps the most well-known act of cyberwarfare in history, Stuxnet has serious geopolitical ramifications.
The details of Stuxnet, also referred to as Operation Olympic Games, are provided below:
- The Stuxnet worm, a self-replicating piece of malware, compromised the Iranian nuclear program at the Natanz plant by physically placing it on a USB drive.
- Its goal was to locate Siemens-made PCLs (programmable logic controllers) on a device and change their programming.
- Changing the PLCs’ code affected the nuclear centrifuges’ spinning speeds, resulting in either damage or destruction.
- The PCLs would simultaneously communicate (falsely) to the controller computer that everything was operating as it should.
At the time, the nuclear plant at Natanz was considered infiltration-proof since its systems were never connected to the internet.
Physical infiltration was the only method of entering the institution. An employee from Natanz inserted the USB disk into a work device, which is precisely how Stuxnet entered the institution.
Once in the wild, the worm randomly moved from device to device on Natanz’s internal network to locate all of the Siemens PLCs.
Remarkably, Stuxnet spread through the Windows PCs in the Natanz plant by exploiting five zero-day vulnerabilities and a backdoor:
- The printer is experiencing a problem.
- A problem with a Windows shortcut
- Two privilege vulnerability escalations
- An issue with Siemens PLCs
- The firewall attack exploited one of the backups.
If you are familiar with cybersecurity, you are aware that it is quite rare to exploit many vulnerabilities at once.
Hackers tend to avoid disclosing all information at once. Security firms usually provide a patch to prevent the hacker from accessing the system after discovering a zero-day vulnerability in the wild.
However, Stuxnet was an uncontrollable cyberattack that only needed one chance to breach the Natanz site and destroy its nuclear program.
Additionally, developers used a variety of object-oriented programming languages, including C and C++, to develop the worm.
It continues to be one of the most advanced malware programs ever created. Even now, experts are analyzing it to gain knowledge.
But was Stuxnet a success? Indeed, it was a significant success. In a year, it was able to decommission almost 2,000 centrifuges, compared to an average of about 800 decommissioned centrifuges.
Iran’s nuclear development is believed to have suffered a delay of at least two years due to Stuxnet. Only a Natanz employee, using a work device, discovered Stuxnet.
Eventually, security professionals discovered it and, for the most part, decrypted it. Its code consisted of more than 15,000 lines, far more than any previous virus.
It all began when a Natanz employee inserted a single USB drive into a work device after discovering it by chance.
A complete and utter baiting attack!
2009 Operation Aurora
Disclaimer: Operation Aurora was not a standard baiting attack; it simply had baiting aspects (spear phishing methods). Instead, it focused on taking advantage of backdoors and zero-day vulnerabilities.
The Elderwood Group (Chinese ties) launched one of the largest cyberattacks in history, Operation Aurora, on a number of well-known American corporations.
Confirmed targets include:
- Adobe Systems
- Akamai Technologies
- Juniper Networks
- Rackspace
Various accounts claim that Operation Aurora also targeted Morgan Stanley, Northrop Grumman, Yahoo, Dow Chemical, and Symantec.
The attack’s primary objective was to steal source code databases, or trade secrets, from the US commercial sector.
The events unfold in the following order:
The Attack Starts
Operation Aurora’s intricate nature makes its structure intriguing. McAfee said that the attackers exploited a number of zero-day vulnerabilities in the Perforce revision software and the Internet Explorer browser client.
By posing as coworkers or reliable sources, the hackers successfully sent attractive emails to workers at these firms. They tricked the victims into clicking on dangerous links that would infect company equipment with malware.
The attackers were able to obtain the elevated access required to enter the organizations’ computer systems by using spear-phishing techniques and zero-day exploits.
Additionally, they obtained access to the computer systems through backdoor connections into Gmail accounts.
Google declares the attack.
Google revealed on its blog on January 12, 2010, that it had been the target of a Chinese attack in mid-December.
Additionally, they said that the same group attacked more than 20 businesses within the same time frame.
Google said it would think about severing its commercial ties with China as a result. Other parties made a number of additional political statements on the same day.
In response to these allegations, the Chinese government did not issue a public statement.
Symantec Begins Attack Investigation
Symantec and McAfee, two cybersecurity organizations, promised to look into the incident on Google’s and all the other impacted companies’ behalf.
They concluded that the Elderwood Group was in charge of Operation Aurora after reviewing the data, which included IP addresses, malware signatures, and domain names.
The hacking collective, commonly known as the “Beijing Group,” obtained information about a number of Chinese dissidents as well as portions of Google’s source code.
Since “Aurora” was a file path present in two of the malware used in the attacks, Dmitri Alperovitch, VP of Threat Research at McAfee, named the attack “Operation Aurora.”
Aftermath
When the attacks became public, several nations temporarily stopped using Internet Explorer due to its zero-day vulnerabilities.
Additionally, Google left China and now only runs a Hong Kong-based local version of their search engine.
Given that China suffered greater losses following the strike than the US, Operation Aurora turned out to be more harmful to China than to the US.
Artificial Intelligence’s Function in Identifying and Stopping Baiting Attacks
A key component of cybersecurity is artificial intelligence (AI), which is used to identify and stop phishing attacks. AI-powered cybersecurity systems that use machine learning algorithms may learn to spot suspicious patterns, detect abnormalities, and react to threats instantly. This provides strong defense against a range of online dangers, including baiting attacks.
The Future of Attacks Using Baiting
We could expect to see increasingly complex and difficult-to-detect baiting attempts as fraudsters continue to develop and hone their methods. But by keeping up with the most recent developments in cybersecurity, implementing strong security protocols, and encouraging a culture of attention and awareness, we can defend our companies and ourselves against these changing dangers.
Conclusion
Baiting attacks, a form of social engineering, exploit human curiosity and greed to lure victims into compromising their security. By offering enticing rewards or promising solutions, attackers trick individuals into downloading malware or revealing sensitive information. Recognizing and preventing baiting attacks requires a multifaceted approach, including cybersecurity awareness training, critical thinking, and robust security measures. By understanding the tactics employed by attackers, individuals and organizations can effectively mitigate the risks associated with these deceptive techniques.
See Also:
Image of Spear Phishing Email with Victims Employerad Link Example